Legal Opinion

O'Connor v. Nevada

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 8, 1994No. 92-16803PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge T.G. NELSON.

T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge:

I

OVERVIEW

Marilyn O’Connor and Eleanor Waugh appeal the district court’s judgment in favor of the State of Nevada in their action challenging the constitutionality of Nev.Rev.Stat. § 2.020(2), which requires candidates for the Nevada Supreme Court to be attorneys. Because O’Connor and Waugh are not attorneys, they were not permitted to run as candidates for the office of Nevada Supreme Court Justice. They raise several arguments on appeal. We affirm.

II

BACKGROUND

On May 7, 1992, O’Connor filed with the Nevada Secretary of State her…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Bullock v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Clements v. FashingSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. Ruth StudleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. O'connor v. State Of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API