Legal Opinion
Seaborn Pile Driving Co. v. Glew
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 9, 2006No. 54796-8-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.
¶1 — In 1999, Seaborn Pile Driving Company, Inc., built a 70 foot pier for Gayle and Janet Glew. In February of 2000, Seaborn sued to collect $1,824.48 due for the work. The Glews denied owing anything to Seaborn and counterclaimed for breach of contract and violation of the Consumer Protection Act1 (CPA) because the work had not been properly permitted.
¶2 Seaborn made a Civil Rule (CR) 68 offer of judgment for $4,500 in exchange for dismissal of the Glews’ counterclaims. The offer did not mention costs or attorney fees, nor did it address Seaborn’s collection claim. The Glews accepted the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Herrington v. County of SonomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- James Richard Erdman v. Cochise County, Arizona and City of Douglas, ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Ronald J. Radecki and Radecki's Service, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Miller v. KennyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- McGuire v. BatesWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- McGuire v. BatesWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Lietz v. Hansen Law Offices, PSCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Atlas Supply, Inc. v. Realm, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.