Mast, Mast, Johnson, Wells & Trimyer, P.A. v. Lane
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
McCullough, Judge.
Keith Lane (“defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s entry of an order for summary judgment. For the following reasons, we affirm.
I. Background
Defendant retained the law firm of Mast, Schulz, Mast, Mills & Stem, P.A., now doing business as Mast, Mast, Johnson, Wells & Trimyer, P.A. (“plaintiff’), in November of 2000 to represent him in a legal dispute over money paid to Lane Farms, of which defendant was a partial owner. At that time, defendant executed plaintiffs Minimum Fee Employment Agreement (the “Fee Agreement”), whereby defendant agreed to pay plaintiff “a minimum…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Forbis v. NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
- In Re the Will of JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
- Mazda Motors of America, Inc. v. Southwestern Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Nello L. Teer Company v. Dickerson, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Hinkle, Cox, Eaton, Coffield & Hensley v. Cadle Co. of Ohio, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kapur v. Imw Emr, LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2020