Hinkle, Cox, Eaton, Coffield & Hensley v. Cadle Co. of Ohio, Inc.
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MONTGOMERY, Justice.
This is an appeal and a cross-appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, a law firm, awarding it the amount sought in its complaint as fees allegedly earned in representing the defendant over a period of time (plus prejudgment interest, costs, and attorney’s fees), and dismissing the defendant’s counterclaims. Defendant, Cadle Company of Ohio, Inc. (“Cadle”), 1 challenges the trial court’s orders granting summary judgment to the plaintiff, Hinkle, Cox, Eaton, Coffield & Hensley (“Hinkle”), on Hinkle’s complaint and on Cadle’s counterclaims to recover amounts…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Weaver v. LaubSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Comer & Co. v. Way & EdmundsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Thompson Drilling, Inc. v. RomigNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
- Jacobs v. HolstonOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
- Peck v. Title USA Ins. Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. Alvarez-LopezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- Jaramillo v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- Calhoun v. CalhounSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Robbins v. KrockMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
- Leafland Group-II, Montgomery Towers Ltd. Partnership v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.