Legal Opinion

Clark v. City of Munster

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided May 26, 1987No. Civ. No. H 86-267PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ANDREW P. RODOVICH, United States Magistrate.

This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Strike filed by the defendants on February 5, 1987, the Motion for Protective Order and for [sic] Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum filed by the plaintiffs on March 18, 1987, the Motion to Compel Discovery filed by the defendants on April 6, 1987, the Motion to Compel Discovery filed by the defendants on December 8, 1986, and the Motion to Amend Complaint filed by the plaintiffs on January 27, 1987. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion to Strike is DENIED, the Motion for Protective Order is…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. Grolier Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Zicarelli v. New Jersey State Commission of InvestigationSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Remington Arms Co. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1992
  2. Leonen v. Johns-ManvilleDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
  3. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Shreveport, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988
  4. Harter v. University of IndianapolisDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1998
  5. Langeland v. Monarch Motors, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API