Legal Opinion

People v. Morrison

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 26, 1987No. 2-84-0623, 2-84-1067 consPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hopf

The defendants, Richard Pope and Charles Morrison, attendants at adult bookstores, were each separately charged and found guilty by a jury of the crime of obscenity on three counts. Each count alleged the sale of an obscene magazine. Both defendants filed timely post-trial motions, renewing a constitutional issue asserted in their pretrial motions to dismiss, which had previously been denied. That issue centered on the defendants’ claim that the Illinois obscenity statute in existence at the time they were charged and tried was unconstitutional in failing to require that the value element of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. SclafaniAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  2. United States v. Robert Joe Garcia Easley, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Robert Joe Garcia Easley, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API