Legal Opinion

William H. Barkhorn & Co. v. Zinno

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 28, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was tried without a jury in the District Court of Orange, and judgment in the amonnt of $288.83 was rendered for plaintiff.

The suit was for a balance of the purchase price of lumber sold and delivered to defendant.

It is objected by the defendant that the complaint does not state a cause of action, because the date of the sale and delivery of the lumber is not alleged. It is sufficient to remark that the date of sale appears in an itemized statement attached to and made part of the complaint.

It is next contended that there was no proof of sale or delivery of the "extras” included…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Benedict v. PriceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1929
  2. Duff v. Trenton Beverage Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API