Legal Opinion

Clinton v. Hanson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 1, 1983No. 82-387PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHORES, Justice.

The only issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial judge erred in granting the plaintiffs’ motion for new trial after a jury verdict in favor of the defendant. We hold that he did not and affirm.

Calvin and Mary Lou Hanson were travelling north on U.S. 280 on Labor Day, 1979, at about 5:00 p.m. It was raining hard. As Mr. Hanson crested Double Oak Mountain, he saw ten or twelve cars backed up because of an accident ahead. He stopped about two car lengths beyond the last car. Mr. Clinton was also driving north on U.S. 280. He testified that he had been following the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Gribble v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  3. Glanton v. HuffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pacheco v. PaulsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Taylor v. WheelerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API