Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 27, 2010No. A10A0632PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHIPPS, Presiding Judge.

Uriah Joel Smith was tried by a jury and convicted of armed robbery, kidnapping and aggravated assault. The trial court denied Smith’s motion for new trial, and Smith appeals. He claims that his trial counsel was ineffective in severed respects. Because Smith has failed to demonstrate that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance, we affirm.

“The benchmark for judging any claim of ineffectiveness must be whether counsel’s conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result.”…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Suggs v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  3. Brodes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  4. Domingues v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  5. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Glass v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  2. Bunn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. White v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  5. The State v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API