Brodes v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
BENHAM, Justice.
Appellant J. Brodre Brodes was convicted of two counts of armed robbery in a trial in which the only evidence implicating him was the testimony of the two victims identifying him as the perpetrator. The victims testified they were “absolutely certain” of their identification of him and were repeatedly called upon by the prosecuting attorney to repeat their certainty in the accuracy of their identification. In its instructions to the jury, the trial court gave the pattern jury instruction on eyewitness identification,1 which informs the jurors they may *436consider a witness’s…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. LongUtah Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. TatumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. ClassenOregon Supreme Court · 1979
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- State v. Lawson/JamesOregon Supreme Court · 2012
- Haliym v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Deshawn GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Inman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.