Legal Opinion

United States v. Earnest Eugene Cherry

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided May 7, 2009No. 08-14459UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Earnest Cherry, a federal prisoner who was convicted of a crack cocaine offense, appeals through counsel, the denial of his pro se motion to reduce his sentence, filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and the denial of his motion for reconsideration. 1 Cherry’s motion was based on Amendment 706 to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1, which lowered the base offense levels applicable to crack cocaine convictions. Because Cherry received a 240-month statutory minimum sentence under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A), his sentence was based on something other than the offense level calculation under § 2D1.1. Consequently,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. United States v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Chester McCoy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. GloverDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API