Legal Opinion

Clemens v. Estes

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided February 10, 1885PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. Motion for injunction pendente lite.

1Opinion of the CourtColt, J.

This is a motion fora preliminary injunction. The material facts, as disclosed in the bill and affidavits, are as follows:

The defendants, .Estes & Lauriat, are a firm of book-sellers and publishers located in Boston. In their last holiday catalogue appeared an advertisement in which a new work, entitled “Huckleberry Finn,” written by the plaintiff under'tlie, name of Mark Twain, was offered for sale at a price, reduced from $2.75 to $2.25. Tiie book is sold on what is known as the subscription plan, and the regular subscription price is $2.75. The canvass for the book has been in progress for…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. L'Anza Research International, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Independent News Co., Inc., National Comics Publications, Inc., Superman, Inc. v. Harry WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  3. Harrison v. Maynard, Merrill & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1894
  4. Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. StrausU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1905
  5. Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. L'Anza Research International, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API