Paul Seckinger v. the Zurich Services Corporation
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
McFADDEN, Judge.
These appeals are from trial court orders granting summary judgment to defendants in a negligent inspection case arising out of the catastrophic explosion of a sugar refinery plant operated by the Imperial Sugar Company. Because the trial court correctly found that there exists no genuine issue of material fact, we affirm.
To prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. A defendant may do this by either presenting evidence negating an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Huggins v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Baskin v. Georgia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Davenport v. Cummins Alabama, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Finley v. LehmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Guideone Mutual Insurance v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Garvin v. Atlanta Gas Light CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- GARLAND FAVORITO v. ALEX WANCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2022
- TACTICAL SECURITY GROUP, LLC v. CYNTHIA WELCHCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2024