Legal Opinion
Catherine Brown v. Minyango Tokpah, et al.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided April 9, 2026No. 2:21-cv-01844Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CATHERINE BROWN CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO: 21-1844 MINYANGO TOKPAH, ET AL. SECTION: “H” ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court are non-party D.M.’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees (Doc. 101) and Defendants Andrea Stewart, Gerald Palmer, and Anti Fraud Warriors, LLC’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees (Doc. 105). For the following reasons, both Motions for Attorney’s Fees are DENIED. BACKGROUND Given this action’s extensive factual and procedural history, the Court incorporates the background outlined in its August 28, 2025 Order and Reasons by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Marx v. General Revenue Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.