Darnell v. Tate
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtWorrill, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The Supreme Court of Georgia, in dealing with a general demurrer in the present litigation (Darnell v. Tate, 206 Ga. 576, 586, 58 S. E. 2d, 160), said: “Under the provisions of Code §§ 113-1101 and 113-2306, the court of ordinary has jurisdiction to accept the resignation of an executor and to appoint a successor according to the manner provided for in the will. The selection of a successor executor does not involve a construction of the will, and the item of the will providing for the manner of appointing a successor is plain and unambiguous, and within…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Darnell v. TateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Yopp v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Gormley v. WatsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Lallerstedt v. JenningsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857
3Cited by3 opinions
- Butts v. Trust Company of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- Darnell v. TateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951