Legal Opinion

Darnell v. Tate

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 15, 1951No. 33606Published

1Opinion of the Court

84 Ga. App. 831 (1951)

67 S.E.2d 819

DARNELL et al.

v.

TATE et al.

33606.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided November 15, 1951.

Henderson & Burtz, Pickett & Pickett, James H. Therrell, for plaintiffs.

Tye, Thomson & Tye, H. G. Vandiviere, H. L. Buffington Jr., for defendants.

WORRILL, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The Supreme Court of Georgia, in dealing with a general demurrer in the present litigation (Darnell v. Tate, 206 Ga. 576, 586, 58 S. E. 2d, 160), said: "Under the provisions of Code §§ 113-1101 and 113-2306, the court of ordinary has jurisdiction to accept the resignation of an…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Sutton; Concurrence · Felton.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Darnell v. TateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  2. Dawson v. ShaveSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  3. Yopp v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  4. Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. Gormley v. WatsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API