R. R. Discrimination Case
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The gist of this action is for discrimination by the defendant in charging the plaintiff a higher rate on logs to the plaintiff's mill in Wilmington than was charged others for like service, and to recover the overcharges which had been paid under protest. The point presented is not that the rate, $2.50 per thousand feet in carload lots charged the plaintiff, is per se unreasonable, but that the rate charged others for the same service for the same distance was $2.10, and this a serious discrimination which if continued will result in the crippling or destruction of the plaintiff's mill and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. GoodridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Consolidated Railroad v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Hays v. Pennsylvania Co.United States Circuit Court · 1882
- Menacho v. WardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1886
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. City of WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Wilcox v. Durham & Charlotte RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911