Legal Opinion

Holst v. Warner

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1927No. 24484PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

Plaintiff brought this action against his mother-in-law, to recover damages for the alienation of his wife’s affections. In a general way he alleged that the acts and conduct of defendant were wilful and malicious and such as to, in fact, alienate the affections of his wife. In her answer defendant admitted the relationship of the parties; denied that she had alienated the affections of plaintiff’s wife or done any act calculated to bring about that result; and alleged that the affections of plaintiff’s wife were alienated by his own misconduct; that plaintiff had no affection for his wife,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hiatt v. KinkaidNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. McDonald v. BowmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Stocker v. StockerNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Armann v. BuelNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Mattern v. McCarthyNebraska Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morrow v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Anderson v. Nebraska Defense Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Babson v. Crete MillsNebraska Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API