Legal Opinion

Bass v. Butler

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 30, 2004No. 02-4027PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

The initial complaint in this matter presented a constitutional due process challenge to the procedures Pennsylvania uses to evaluate workers’ compensation claims. Over the course of more than ten years of active litigation in several courts, however, many layers of complex procedural issues have beclouded this initial claim. Appellant Dianne Bass now challenges the District Court’s order dismissing her case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, which the court based on the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Board of School Comm'rs of Indianapolis v. JacobsSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. 71 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 801, 69 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,370 Judith S. Dici v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania State Police Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement Frank H. Monaco Steven B. BrisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Knopick v. UBS Financial Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Rice v. Electrolux Home Prods., Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. EZEKWO v. FAY SERVICING, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
  4. FOX v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
  5. LOPEZ v. PECDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API