Legal Opinion

Woods Exploration & Producing Co. v. Arkla Equipment Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1975No. B-5160PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Justice.

On the principal question to be decided here, we hold that the clerk’s certificate showing that a deposit has been made in lieu of an appeal bond may, when warranted by the facts, be amended to show that the deposit was made for the benefit of parties not named in the original certificate.

The suit was brought by Arkla Equipment Company against Woods Exploration and Producing Company, Inc. (Exploration), Eastern Pipeline Company (Eastern), and Stanley C. Woods to recover on two promissory notes executed by Exploration and Eastern and partially guaranteed by Stanley C. Woods.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  2. International Security Life Insurance Co. v. FinckTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Owen v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Waples-Platter Co. v. Commercial Standard InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  5. United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States & Canada v. BordenTexas Supreme Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Rizkallah v. Conner, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
  2. Kunstoplast of America, Inc. v. Formosa Plastics Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Grand Prairie Independent School District v. Southern Parts Imports, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Espalin v. Children's Medical Center of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000
  5. Warwick Towers Council of Co-Owners Ex Rel. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Park Warwick L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2008

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API