Legal Opinion

Ramon v. County of Santa Clara

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 4, 2009No. H032542PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MIHARA, Acting P. J.

Martin Ramon brought a class action to prevent the County of Santa Clara (County) from billing individuals for the cost of their arrests for driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs when there was no emergency “incident” as the term is used in Government Code section 53150. After the parties entered into a settlement agreement that provided injunctive and declaratory relief to the class, the trial court awarded attorney’s fees to Ramon pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5. On appeal, Ramon challenges the amount of the attorney’s fees award. He…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Serrano v. UnruhCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Connerly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Yeskey v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania Department Of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kinder v. Woodbolt Distribution, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
  2. Quinn, Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan v. Kurtin CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Weisner v. Santa Cruz County Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API