Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Yalovitz

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 17, 1929No. 19516PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

The present case is governed by the general rule that the first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed by this court unless it affirmatively appears that the verdict as returned was absolutely demanded by the evidence. Civil Code (1910), § 6204; Rowe Motor Express Co. v. Twiggs County, 152 Ga. 548 (110 S. E. 303) ; Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Barksdale, 34 Ga. App. 812 (131 S. E. 298).

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., coneu/r.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rowe Bros. Motor Express Co. v. Twiggs CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BarksdaleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Moore v. RossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930