Legal Opinion
Holmes v. Yalovitz
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 17, 1929No. 19516PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
The present case is governed by the general rule that the first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed by this court unless it affirmatively appears that the verdict as returned was absolutely demanded by the evidence. Civil Code (1910), § 6204; Rowe Motor Express Co. v. Twiggs County, 152 Ga. 548 (110 S. E. 303) ; Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Barksdale, 34 Ga. App. 812 (131 S. E. 298).
Judgment affirmed.
Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., coneu/r.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rowe Bros. Motor Express Co. v. Twiggs CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BarksdaleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
3Cited by1 opinion
- Moore v. RossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930