Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barksdale

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 16, 1926No. 16417PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJerkins, P. J.

1. “The first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed by the Supreme Court, unless the plaintiff in error shows that the judge abused his discretion in granting it, and that the law and facts required the verdict notwithstanding the judgment of the presiding judge.” Civil Code (1910), § 6204. - “However great the preponderance of evidence in favor of the party who was successful upon the trial of the ease in the lower court, the first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed unless it appears, upon examination of all the evidence, that the verdict as rendered was demanded; and as it can…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thornton v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. LedinghamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. National Union Fire Insurance v. OzburnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Connally Realty Co. v. NalleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  3. Belk v. CookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Holmes v. YalovitzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  5. Sunbeam Heating Co. v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API