Doe v. Blunt
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Per curiam
Overview
Doe pleaded guilty in May 2004 to the public display of explicit sexual material in violation of section 573.060. 1 At the time Doe pleaded guilty, the duty of registering as a sex offender did not apply to this offense. In August 2004, the law changed so that those convicted of public display of explicit sexual material were required to register as a sex offender. Section 589400.1(2), RSMo Supp.2005. Subsequently, a probation violation report was filed against Doe for failing to register. 2
Doe filed this declaratory judgment action to determine his obligation to register as a sex…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Doe v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bacon v. NeerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- State v. HoldenSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- MARK J. HORTON v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. GuyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Doe v. NeerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.