Legal Opinion
Doherty v. Wireless Broadcasting Systems of Sacramento, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 11, 1998No. 97-16046PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LAY, Circuit Judge:
The memorandum disposition filed July 1, 1998, is redesignated as an authored opinion by Judge Lay.
OPINION
Event Entertainment, Inc. (“Event”) and Don King Productions/KingVision (“King”) brought suit against Bruce Doherty for violations of 47 U.S.C. § 553, enacted as part of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, 47 U.S.C. § 605, enacted as part of the Communications Act of 1934 (collectively, the “Act”), as well as state law claims for conversion and intentional interference with prospective economic advantage. In each case, Doherty filed a third-party complaint…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Velarde v. Pace Membership Warehouse, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
3Cited by13 opinions
- McMillan v. Equifax Credit Information Services, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- Keith v. Data Enterprises, Inc.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2019
- PPV Connection, Inc. v. RodriguezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2005
- Crispin v. Christian Audigier, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. ArguetaDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.