Legal Opinion

Boro Hall Corp. v. General Motors Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 19, 1948No. Civil Action No. 5592Published

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, District Judge.

Originally the plaintiff’s claim was asserted in two counts, the first of which may be roughly described as a claim of breach of contract, and the second as a claim for relief on the basis of estoppel. The complaint was dismissed on motion. Boro Hall Corporation v. General Motors Corporation., D. C. E.D.N.Y. 1946, 68 F.Supp. 589. On appeal the dismissal of the “equitable” cause of action was affirmed, but the “law” count was remanded for trial. 2 Cir., 1947, 164 F.2d 770.

Now the plaintiff, having failed to make timely demand for a jury trial, urges that, as matter of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boro Hall Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  2. Boro Hall Corp. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API