Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Republic Bank & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 17, 1978No. 7726SC148PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Summary judgment, of course, is appropriate when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact in the claim for relief. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56. Defendant argues that there was a genuine issue as to plaintiff’s actual loss in the transaction and that, until plaintiff established such loss, summary judgment was not proper. Plaintiff’s counter-argument is that the amount of loss was the amount of the check, and that that amount was clearly established.

G.S.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Isaac v. American Heritage Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Siegel v. New England Merchants National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Hughes v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.Rochester City Court · 1985
  4. Chute v. Bank One of Akron, N.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. SOUTHEAST FIRST NAT. BK v. Atlantic TelecDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API