Legal Opinion

Siegel v. New England Merchants National Bank

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 1, 1982PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, C.J.

We are called upon to define the respective rights of a bank and its depositor when the bank has paid a postdated check before maturity and deducted the amount of the check from the depositor’s account. Applying the Uniform Commercial Code, G. L. c. 106, we conclude that the bank must recredit the depositor’s account, but may then assert against the depositor any rights acquired by prior holders on either the instrument or the transaction from which it arose. In the course of this opinion, we shall describe the parties’ responsibilities of proof with respect to the bank’s subrogation claim.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  2. Knowles v. Gilchrist Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  3. Board of Assessors v. New England Oyster House, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  4. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp. v. Guaranty Bank & Trust Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1958
  5. Owens v. DinkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Plaza Hotel Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1990
  2. Govoni & Sons Construction Co. v. Mechanics BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  3. Isaac v. American Heritage Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  4. Bank of America, N.A. v. Prestige Imports, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
  5. Dalton v. First National Bank of GraysonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API