Legal Opinion

Willard v. Mohn

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1913PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from District Court for Williams County; Goss, J. This action, in tort, survives the death of the. tort feasor. Rev. Codes, Sec. 6789; 13 Current Law, 1245, note 25; Devine v. Healy, 241 Ill. 34, 89 X. E. 251; 21 Enc. PL & Pr. 346, note 3. Action must he brought in name of real party in interest. Rev. Codes, § 6407. Infant must sue in his own name by his guardian ad litem. Price v. Phcenix Mut. L. Ins.

Read the full summary

Appeal from District Court for Williams County; Goss, J. This action, in tort, survives the death of the. tort feasor. Rev. Codes, Sec. 6789; 13 Current Law, 1245, note 25; Devine v. Healy, 241 Ill. 34, 89 X. E. 251; 21 Enc. PL & Pr. 346, note 3. Action must he brought in name of real party in interest. Rev. Codes, § 6407. Infant must sue in his own name by his guardian ad litem. Price v. Phcenix Mut. L. Ins. Co. 17 Minn. 497, Gil. 473; Perine v. Grand Lodge, A. O. U. W. 48 Minn. 82, 50 X. W. 1022; Peterson v. Baillif, 52 Minn. 386, 54 X. W. 185. Action against administrator for personal tort…

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

This is an action brought to recover damages for wrongful death under chapter 38, Revised Codes 1905, commonly known as Lord Campbell’s act. The action is entitled “David Willard, Guardian ad Litem for Alva Yernon Willard, an Infant, Plaintiff, vs B. L. Mohn, Administrator of the Estate of Alfred Thorson, Deceased,” and in substance alleges that David Willard, plaintiff herein, as guardian ad litem, is the duly appointed guardian ad litem of and for Alva Yernon Willard, who is an infant of the age of one year. That B. L. Mohn, the nominal defendant, is the duly appointed and acting…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Perine v. Grand Lodge of Ancient Order United WorkmenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Bates v. SylvesterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  3. Harshman v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Satterberg v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Rich v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bartholomay v. St. Thomas Lumber CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Martinelli v. BurkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Johnson v. RutherfordNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Grabow v. BergethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Anderson v. WirkmanMontana Supreme Court · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API