Legal Opinion
United States v. Loskocinski
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 8, 1975No. 75 C 1358PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRAMWELL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the application of the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York for an order enforcing a Grand Jury subpoena duces tecum served upon the Brooklyn Branch of the National Bank of North America (the “Bank”) directing that it turn over to the Government certain bank and cashier’s cheeks. Pursuant to Rule 17(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Bank has interposed a cross-motion to quash and vacate the said subpoena.
I
The facts of this matter may be briefly summarized as follows: On July 2, 1975 a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Essgee Co. of China v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- United States v. First National City BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- In re Certain Chinese Family Benevolent & District Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1956
- In re Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Morgan Guaranty Trust Company Of New York v. American Savings And Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Blake v. Woodford Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
- Met Frozen Food Corp. v. National Bank of North AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- United States v. Grand Jury InvestigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Available Iron & Metal Co. v. First National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.