Legal Opinion

Carney v. Federal Express Corp., No. Cv 02 0467894 (Feb. 19, 2003)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 19, 2003No. CV 02 0467894Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE MOTION TO STRIKE #111

The plaintiffs have filed a motion to strike the defendant Gaffney's First and Second Special Defenses to Count Six of the plaintiffs' complaint. The plaintiffs argue that the doctrine of parental immunity bars counterclaims and special defenses alleging negligent supervision, as pleaded by the defendant Gaffney in the First Special Defense, and that the defendant's Second Special Defense does not allege any facts and thus, is legally insufficient.

The present action…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Gordon v. Bridgeport Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Dubay v. IrishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Alarm Applications Co. v. Simsbury Volunteer Fire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. Nowak v. NowakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API