Legal Opinion

Acklen v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1954PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

The plaintiffs in error were convicted of a conspiracy to violate various gaming statutes. Aciden’s punishment was fixed .at a fine of $750- and a six months workhouse sentence. The others received a fine of $100’ and a three months workhouse sentence. The variation in fine is probably due to the fact that Aciden was the principal and the others were his subordinates.

The District Attorney General of Davidson County assigned one John Cole to investigate .an alleged numbers racket in this County. After some investigation Cole learned that one of the defendants, League, was in possession of a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hughes v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Robertson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Cox v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Solomon v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Deitch v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. McClary v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  4. State v. PadavanoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  5. United States v. FineDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API