Legal Opinion

Gober v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 6, 1947No. 31540PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

While it is the rule of this State that when the guilt of the accused depends upon the possession of an article, alleged to have been contained in the house burglarized, it is essential that the identity of the articles found in his possession with the articles which are alleged to have been stolen shall be established beyond a reasonable doubt (Evans v. State, 60 Ga. App. 26, 2 S. E. 2d, 745; Stewart v. State, 9 Ga. App. 501, 71 S. E. 755; Rayfield v. State, 5 Ga. App. 816, 63 S. E. 920; Williams v. State, 33 Ga. App. 347 (2), 126 S. E. 267; Carter v. State, 57 Ga. App. 180, 194 S. E. 842;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Rayfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  3. Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  4. Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  5. Blocker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ingram v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API