Greene v. Hoekstra
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1ConcurrenceJackson, Judge
Although I concur in the result reached by the majority in this case, I respectfully disagree with the analysis employed with respect to-the expert witness fees. Specifically, I cannot agree with the majority opinion’s statement that “in determining whether the trial court is barred by the lack of a subpoena from awarding the costs of an expert witness, ... it is the service of the subpoena on the witness, not the service of the subpoena on the opposing partyf,] which is dis-positive.” (Emphasis added). I, therefore, write separately to express my concern that the majority opinion diminishes…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Biocore Medical Technologies, Inc. v. KhosrowshahiDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- Murphy v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2000
- Beck v. VoncannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953