Legal Opinion

Hurd v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 9, 1977No. 53869PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ONION, Presiding Judge.

This appeal arises out of a conviction for burglary of a habitation. See V.T.C.A., Penal Code, § 30.02. The punishment assessed by the court was five (5) years’ confinement in the Department of Corrections.

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel on appeal has filed a brief in which he concludes that the appeal is frivolous and wholly without merit. Aware of his duties under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Cr.App.1969), counsel has served a copy of his brief upon the appellant and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gainous v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. Currie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Ex Parte DickeyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Reed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Lancaster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Adrian Maynard Lister v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
  4. Andrew Dwayne Ellis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  5. Andrew Jackson Altic v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1992

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API