Legal Opinion
Rauch, Weaver, Millsaps, Bigelow & Co. v. Central Bank & Trust Co. of Miami
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 13, 1984No. 83-2130PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
This is a non-final appeal, taken pursuant to Rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(i), Fla.R.App.P., which questions the propriety of a trial court order determining jurisdiction over several parties-plaintiff.1 We reverse.
To facilitate collection of monies due on a promissory note, several beneficiaries of the estate of Henry Van Baay named the appellant, Rauch, Weaver, Millsaps, Bige-low & Company (Rauch), as their agent. The beneficiaries gave Rauch title to the promissory note on which Whatever, Inc., was the promisor and Roman Moreth was the guarantor. The note was secured by a mortgage on property owned…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Paul v. BlakeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- National Lake Developments, Inc. v. Lake Tippecanoe Owners Assoc., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Schurkman v. StolarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Durrant v. DaytonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matut v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
- Superior Ins. Co. v. LibertDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Sivak v. Brady-Spencer Management Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Matut v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987