Matut v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
Held, for the purposes of sec. 6867, I.R.C. 1954, the owner of seized cash is determined.
1Opinion of the Court
Albert Matut as Possessor of Certain Cash, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent
Matut v. Commissioner
Docket No. 32639-84
United States Tax Court
88 T.C. 1250; 1987 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 69; 88 T.C. No. 69;
May 11, 1987; Affirmed in part; Vacated in part and Remanded October 25, 1988 May 11, 1987, Filed
Held, for the purposes of sec. 6867, I.R.C. 1954, the owner of seized cash is determined.
Michael J. Osman, for the petitioner.
Michael B. Axman, for the respondent.
Whitaker, Judge. Simpson, Nims, Shields, Cohen, Clapp, Swift, Wright, Parr, and Wells, JJ., agree with the majority…
Also in this document: Dissent · Korner; Dissent · Williams.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Laing v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Shelton v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
- United States v. VarbelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Sampson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
- Matut v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.