Legal Opinion

Matut v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided May 11, 1987No. Docket No. 32639-84Published

Held, for the purposes of sec. 6867, I.R.C. 1954, the owner of seized cash is determined.

1Opinion of the Court

Albert Matut as Possessor of Certain Cash, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Matut v. Commissioner

Docket No. 32639-84

United States Tax Court

88 T.C. 1250; 1987 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 69; 88 T.C. No. 69;

May 11, 1987; Affirmed in part; Vacated in part and Remanded October 25, 1988 May 11, 1987, Filed

Held, for the purposes of sec. 6867, I.R.C. 1954, the owner of seized cash is determined.

Michael J. Osman, for the petitioner.

Michael B. Axman, for the respondent.

Whitaker, Judge. Simpson, Nims, Shields, Cohen, Clapp, Swift, Wright, Parr, and Wells, JJ., agree with the majority…

Also in this document: Dissent · Korner; Dissent · Williams.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Laing v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Shelton v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
  3. United States v. VarbelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Sampson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
  5. Matut v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API