Legal Opinion

Cook v. South Omaha National Bank

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the District Court, Sheridan County, Hon. Joseph E. Stotts; Judge. Heard on motion of defendant in error to dismiss, and on motion of plaintiff in error for extension of time to file hriefs. cited, in support of the motion to dismiss, Bank v. Anderson, 5 Wyo., 5x8; Cronkhite v. Bothwell, 3 Wyo., 739; Robertson v. Shorow, 10 Wyo., 368.

1Per curiam

The petition in error herein was filed July 22, 1904. No briefs for plaintiff in error having been filed withiii sixty days thereafter, as required by the rules of the court, and no order having been made extending the time therefor, the defendant in error, on September 22, 1904, and after the expiration of the period allowed plaintiff in error for filing briefs, filed a motion to dismiss the proceeding on the ground of the failure of plaintiff in error to file and serve hriefs as required by the rules.

*188After the motion had been brought to the attention of the court, and a time had been…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cronkhite v. BothwellWyoming Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Small v. Johnson County Savings BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Ford v. TownsendWyoming Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Brown v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Starley v. WildeWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Wilhelm v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API