Legal Opinion

Cronkhite v. Bothwell

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1892PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Motion by Albert J. Bothwell to dismiss proceedings in error brought by Aaron H. Cronkhite and others in their cause. For former report, see ante, 736, 30 Pac. Rep. 492.

1Opinion of the CourtGroesbeck, C. J.

The defendant in error, by his attorneys, moved to dismiss the proceedings in error in this cause, for the reason that the plaintiffs in error had failed to file their briefs within 60 days after filing the petition in error, as required by rule 21 of this court, (26 Pac. Rep. xiii.,) and this motion was filed May 16, 1892. The cause was dismissed, but, upon application of the plaintiffs in error, it was reinstated, because the record did not affirmatively show that notice of this motion to dismiss was served upon the plaintiffs in error, and because the application to reinstate, which was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. BreitlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  2. Green v. ElbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Hughes v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1858
  4. Coyote G. & S. M. Co. v. RubleOregon Supreme Court · 1881
  5. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Frederick v. District Court of Fifth Judicial District Ex Rel. County of Big HornWyoming Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Allen v. HounWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Phillips v. BrillWyoming Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Robertson v. ShorowWyoming Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Small v. Johnson County Savings BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1907

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API