Legal Opinion
Dal-Tile Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided September 1, 2000No. Slip Op. 00-115; Court 95-11-01550PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARMAN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, Dal-Tile Corporation (Dal-Tile), moves for summary judgment pursuant to U.S. CIT R. 56(a), contending it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law because under 19 U.S.C. § 1505 (1994), 1 it is entitled to interest on eight million dollars of Customs duties deposited refunded to it by the United States Customs Service (Customs).
Defendant, United States, opposes plaintiffs motion and cross-moves for summary judgment pursuant to U.S. CIT R. 56(b), contending it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law because under 19 U.S.C. § 1505, plaintiff is entitled…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- International Business MacHines Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Utex International Inc., and Sentry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Travenol Laboratories, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Novacor Chemicals, Inc. (Formerly Known as Polysar Inc.),plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. American Home Assurance Co.United States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Swisher International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Chemsol, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- United States v. International Fidelity Insurance Co.United States Court of International Trade · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.