American Modern Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Lacey Sullivan and Daniel Sullivan, a married couple, individually, and as natural guardians to Infant Sullivan, a minor and Ryan Yates
District Court, E.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 7 AMERICAN MODERN PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE NO. 2:25-CV-0083-TOR 8 COMPANY, a foreign company, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 9 Plaintiff, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 10 v. 11 LACEY SULLIVAN and DANIEL SULLIVAN, a married couple, 12 individually, and as natural guardians to INFANT SULLIVAN, a minor 13 child, and RYAN YATES, 14 Defendants. 15 BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 16 (ECF No. 13). This matter was submitted for consideration without oral argument. 17 The Court has…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Del P. Henry, Jr., a Single Man, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Gill Industries, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. VanPort Homes, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- William W. Brydges v. Samuel A. Lewis, Director, and D. Gonzales, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Unigard Insurance v. LevenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Allstate Insurance v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.