Legal Opinion
William W. Brydges v. Samuel A. Lewis, Director, and D. Gonzales, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 9, 1994No. 92-17077PublishedCited by 141 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The memorandum disposition filed in this matter on June 8, 1993, 995 F.2d 230, is redesignated as a per curiam opinion.
OPINION
2Per curiam
William W. Brydges, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s order granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
We review de novo the grant of summary judgment. Hopkins v. Andaya, 958 F.2d 881, 884 (9th Cir.1992) (per curiam). A district court may not grant a motion for summary judgment simply because the non-moving party does not file…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Del P. Henry, Jr., a Single Man, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Gill Industries, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Hopkins v. AndayaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
4Cited by141 opinions
- Andres M. Martinez v. G.D. Stanford W. Owen M. Atkinson D. Rockholt J. StovallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Adrian L. Cristobal v. Jeffrey SiegelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Mullen v. SurtshinDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
- Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Arakaki v. SCD-Olanani Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2006
136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.