Legal Opinion

Cammack & Son v. Weimer

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 14, 1917PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Hardin District Court. — J. L. Kamrar, Judge. Action to recover compensation for services rendered under an express contract of employment to oversee and superintend the reconstruction, alteration and repair of a certain dwelling house owned by the defendant. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, C. J.

We set out only so much of the issues as are necessary to an understanding of the matters herein disposed of.

On the 12th day of September, 1914, the plaintiffs filed an amended and substituted petition at law, in which they allege that, on or about the 1st day of June, 1911, they entered into an oral contract with the defendant, by the terms of which the defendant employed them to make certain alterations and improvements upon 'the residence property of the defendant, located in the town of Radcliffe; that these alterations and improvements were to he made according to the orders, directions…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Newman v. Covenant Mutual Insurance Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  2. Barnes v. Hekla Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  3. Rohrbach v. HammillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Smith & Nelson v. BristolSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  5. Prouty v. PerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maasdam v. Estate of MaasdamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  2. Sammon v. RoachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  3. Johnston v. Federal Land BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  4. Fitzgibbon v. Midland Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  5. Gregerson Bros. v. J. G. Cherry Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API