Legal Opinion
Nottebaum v. Leckie
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 28, 1929No. Nos. 3715-3717PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSON, District Judge.
This interminable conflict and confusion is largely, if not solely, due to a proceeding, vitally important to the corporation and its stockholders, which was begun without notice or any opportunity to be heard. To this fundamental violation of the law and its resulting invasion of property rights may be attributed the wretched entanglement disclosed 'by the records in these appeals. A mere statement of the initial situation will-bring the i'ssue clearly into view.
Ralph Nottebaum came from his home in Germany to the United States in 1912, being the discoverer and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills v. MenefeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Pierce v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1904
- State v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
- In re the estate of JonesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
3Cited by6 opinions
- Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. HenwoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Kopke v. MulloySupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- State v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1965
- Indianapolis Dairymen's Co-Op., Inc. v. BottemaIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
- Noxon Chemical Products Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.