Pierce v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On order to show canse why an injunction should not issue and a receiver be appointed of the assets of the defendant corporation the Old Dominion Copper Mining and Smelting Company.
1Opinion of the Court
Stevenson, V. C.
The complainant is a stockholder of the defendant corporation the Old Dominion Copper Mining and Smelting Company, holding $25,000 par value of stock.
The defendants are the Old Dominion Copper Mining and Smelting Company, a corporation under the laws of New Jersey; the United Globe Mines, a corporation under the laws of New York; the Old Dominion Company of Maine, a corporation under the laws of Maine> and twelve natural persons, who include the directors of the above-named three corporations, or the most of them.
The bill alleges that the defendant corporation the Old Dominion…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mickles v. Rochester City BankNew York Court of Chancery · 1844
- Gouveneur v. Mayor of New-YorkNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
3Cited by32 opinions
- Solimine v. HollanderNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
- Mackenzie Oil Co. v. Omar Oil & Gas Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
- Eagle Mining & Improvement Co. v. LundNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1910
- FIRST NAT. BANK IN ALBUQUERQUE v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Helfman v. American Light Traction Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.