Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Eubank v. McDonald

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 2013No. 2012-1526PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment dismissing the petition of appellant, James R. Eubank, for a writ of mandamus to compel appellee, Lucas County Court of Common Pleas Judge Frederick McDonald, to issue a new sentencing entry that complies with Crim.R. 32(C). Mandamus will not lie to compel an act that has already been performed. State ex rel. Culgan v. Kimbler, 132 Ohio St.3d 480, 2012-Ohio-3310, 974 N.E.2d 88. Eubank’s sentencing entry fully complied with Crim.R. 32(C) and constituted a final, appealable order because it set forth the fact of his convictions, the sentence, the judge’s signature,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Davis v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State ex rel. Davis v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State ex rel. Jones v. AnstedOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State ex rel. Culgan v. KimblerOhio Supreme Court · 2012

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. The State Ex Rel. Martin v. Greene.Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State ex rel. Simmons v. Breaux (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State ex rel. Martin v. Buchanan (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State ex rel. Ware v. AndrewsOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. State ex rel. Parkey Bey v. LoomisOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API