Legal Opinion · Dissent

Le Vasseur v. Allen Electric Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1953No. Docket 27, Calendar 45,637Published

1Dissent

*133Sharpe, J.

{dissenting). A fair statement of the' facts in the instant case appears in Justice Btjtzel’s opinion. Admitting that the employee was injured “in the course of” his employment does not admit that the injury “arose out of” that employment. In Levchuk v. Krug Cement Products Company, 246 Mich 589, a divided court sustained the commission and the contention of defendants that the injury of plaintiff did not “arise out of” his employment even though it occurred “during the course of” that employment. In that case plaintiff reported for work at defendant’s manufacturing plant in Detroit…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Claim of Katz v. A. Kadans & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Stockley v. School District No. 1 of Portage Township.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Kunze v. Detroit Shade Tree Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Klawinski v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Daniel v. Murray Corp. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API