Legal Opinion
Kuebel v. Department of Wildlife & Fisheries
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 15, 2009No. 2008-CA-1018PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROLAND L. BELSOME, Judge.
1 [Plaintiff-Appellant, Karen Kuebel, appeals the trial court’s judgment sustaining Defendant-Appellee’s exceptions of no cause of action and lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
At the time of her injury, Appellant Karen Kuebel was a Biologist II for Appel-lee, the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries (“DWF”). As a Biologist II, Appellant traveled on vessels to various test sites. On August 24, 2000, Appellant injured her neck and back while gathering samples in a seine net. The trial court…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fulmer v. State, Department of Wildlife & FisheriesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
- Ansardi v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Fulmer v. State, Department of Wildlife & FisheriesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- James v. State, Department of Wildlife & FisheriesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- Adrienne Stermer v. Archer-Daniels-Midland CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.