Legal Opinion
Fulmer v. State, Department of Wildlife & Fisheries
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 6, 2010No. 2010-CA-0088PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID S. GORBATY, Judge.
|tIn this appeal, plaintiff asserts that the trial court erred in granting defendants’ exception of no cause of action. Because we conclude that Kuebel was incorrectly decided, we overrule Kuebel, reverse the trial court’s judgment on the state’s exception, and remand the matter to the trial court for further proceedings. We explain our decision below.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The plaintiff, Desi Fulmer, is an employee of the State of Louisiana, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries. On June 2, 2001, the plaintiff was injured while working as a member of the crew of a…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Clark v. BarnardSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fulmer v. State, Department of Wildlife & FisheriesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
- Ansardi v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- James v. State, Department of Wildlife & FisheriesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- Fulmer v. State, Department of Wildlife & FisheriesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- James v. State, Department of Wildlife & FisheriesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010