Legal Opinion

Haygood v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 21, 1996No. A96A0524PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

After a bench trial, Donna E. Haygood was found guilty of violating a local ordinance against possessing animals which create a nuisance. In her dispositive enumeration of error, Haygood, acting pro se, argues that she was denied her right to a jury trial.

This case arose after Haygood’s neighbor complained to the Cherokee County Animal Control Department that Haygood’s dogs had barked continuously at night for approximately one and one-half years. The animal control department issued a citation charging Haygood with creating a nuisance and ordering her to appear in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ballew v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. McBride v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Howe v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  4. Keith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Hood v. MAYOR & ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF SAVANNAHSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Haygood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Smith v. GreeneSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API